Log significant decisions with structured template for future review. Includes context, options, probabilities, confidence, 2nd/3rd order effects, and scheduled review dates.
Log significant decisions using a structured template so they can be revisited later.
The template captures context, options, probabilities, confidence levels, and sets
a scheduled review date — turning one-off decisions into a compounding learning loop.
Use this skill when Joseph:
All decisions live at /opt/data/wiki/produce/hermes/self/decisions/ (under the Self bucket). The folder contains:
_TEMPLATE.md — the canonical template (copy this for new decisions)README.md — index of all decisions with review datesYYYY-MM-DD-slug.md — individual decision files> Standing rule: Use the full template for ALL decisions — no shortening or compression. Every entry keeps the Confidence %, Decision triggers/tripwires, and Review section. Low-stakes decisions still fill every field.
The template captures:
1. Header: Date, time, physical/mental state, confidence %
2. Context: Situation, why now, what prompted the decision
3. Driving Forces: Push toward change vs pull toward status quo
4. Variables at Play: Fixed factors, uncertainties, negotiables
5. Complications / Complexity: Hidden costs, second-order wrestling
6. Options Considered: Each option with pros/cons/why-rejected
7. Possible Outcomes and Probabilities: Table with best/expected/worst
8. Expected Outcome and Reasoning: Causal chain, mental model, confidence
9. 2nd and 3rd Order Effects: Non-obvious consequences
10. Final Decision: Clear statement + decision triggers/tripwires
11. Review: Scheduled date + outcome assessment (filled at review time)
1. Read /opt/data/wiki/produce/hermes/self/decisions/_TEMPLATE.md for the canonical template
2. Ask Joseph for any missing details (especially: physical/mental state, confidence %, decision triggers)
3. Write the decision file to /opt/data/wiki/produce/hermes/self/decisions/YYYY-MM-DD-slug.md
4. Add entry to /opt/data/wiki/produce/hermes/self/decisions/README.md index table
1. Read the decision file
2. Ask Joseph: "What actually happened? Was the confidence justified? What did you miss?"
3. Fill in the "Review > Outcome Assessment" section
4. Update the README.md to mark as reviewed